Who this is not for
If tracking time is the job — you bill through an agency, someone else invoices, or you need time data across a team and a wall of integrations — keep Toggl Track. Nothing on this page beats it at the timer, and a tool that tried to would be worse at everything else.
Scritta con cura e senza numeri sul prodotto altrui: prezzi e funzioni cambiano, quindi per quelli si rimanda alla loro pagina. Se qualcosa qui e' diventato inesatto, scrivetemelo e lo correggo.
What Toggl Track is genuinely better at
The act of starting and stopping. The desktop and mobile apps, the idle detection, the reminders, the reporting flexibility, the sheer number of places it plugs into — that is years of focused work on one problem, and it shows.
If you have ever abandoned a time tracker because logging felt like a second job, Toggl is the one that usually survives.
The gap that shows up on the last day of the month
Hours are the input. The output is a document someone has to pay. Between the two sit the parts that decide whether you get paid on time: an invoice number that continues the series, a due date, the right VAT treatment for a client in another country, a PDF that looks like it came from a business, and a record of what you already billed so you do not bill it twice.
That is the chain Flowzivo is built around. Unbilled hours become invoice lines with one action; the invoice takes the next number in your sequence; the hours are marked billed so they cannot reappear. Quotes, contracts and rebilled expenses live in the same page.
Pricing, honestly
Flowzivo is 30 days free, then €9 a month or €90 a year, with everything included; €19 a month if you want the automatic chasing of overdue invoices. Toggl Track has a free tier and paid plans that change over time — check their pricing page rather than a number on someone else's site.
The comparison worth doing is not price against price. It is one subscription that covers quoting, invoicing, time and contracts against a time tracker plus whatever you use for the rest.
How to actually choose between them
Answer one question: at the end of the month, what do you spend most time on? If it is recording the hours, keep the tool that makes recording easy. If it is turning the hours into documents and then chasing the documents, that is a different tool.
Some people end up keeping both, and that is a legitimate answer — Toggl for the tracking, something else for the billing. It costs two subscriptions and works.
The case against switching
If you already have an invoicing system you like, adding a second one to gain a slightly shorter path from hours to invoice is not worth the disruption. Switch when the copying between tools is where your errors come from, not because a page told you to consolidate.
Try it with your own numbers
The demo runs the real product with example data. Nothing to install, no account, and anything you type is yours to keep.
No account to look around. Example data, and anything you add is yours to keep.
Questions
Is Flowzivo's timer as good as Toggl's?
No. Toggl has spent years on exactly that, with desktop apps, idle detection and integrations. Flowzivo's timer is good enough for one person working in a browser tab; the advantage is what happens to the hours afterwards.
Can I turn tracked hours into an invoice?
That is the point of it. Unbilled billable hours become invoice lines in one action, and are then marked billed so the same hour cannot be invoiced twice.
Can I import my Toggl history?
No. Export it from Toggl and keep the file. Flowzivo starts from today; your past hours stay readable in the export whatever you use next.
Do I still need an accountant?
Yes. Flowzivo is not accounting software — no double-entry, no bank reconciliation. It gives you and your accountant the documents and reports; the books stay with them.
Can I look at it without signing up?
Yes, the demo has tracked hours across several clients already in it, some billable and some not. No account, nothing kept.